135 GOCC Execs Fail Performance Audit
135 executives of various Government Owned and Controlled Corporations (GOCCs) were given unsatisfactory to poor ratings in their end-of-year performance evaluations. The performance reviews were conducted by independent human resource and workplace productivity consultants, Johnson and Brown Asia (JBA).
In a report submitted to the Senate and the Lower House, JBA Head Analyst Rosario M. Clemente cited several instances of “gross negligence”, “obvious abuse(s) of power and (an) organization’s resources”, and “outright incompetence” as the main reasons for the execs’ dismal performance ratings. “We were surprised at how more than half of these so-called executives were able to get their positions, much less do their duties well,” Santos said. She further added that “JBA’s recommendations for requisite actions towards the erring GOCC executives are included in our report. All I can say is that the individuals concerned will not be too happy with them.”
The performance evaluation was conducted using various methods, including competency and aptitude examinations and peer/staff reviews.
In a report submitted to the Senate and the Lower House, JBA Head Analyst Rosario M. Clemente cited several instances of “gross negligence”, “obvious abuse(s) of power and (an) organization’s resources”, and “outright incompetence” as the main reasons for the execs’ dismal performance ratings. “We were surprised at how more than half of these so-called executives were able to get their positions, much less do their duties well,” Santos said. She further added that “JBA’s recommendations for requisite actions towards the erring GOCC executives are included in our report. All I can say is that the individuals concerned will not be too happy with them.”
The performance evaluation was conducted using various methods, including competency and aptitude examinations and peer/staff reviews.
posted by CSG at 2:51 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home